Censorship? They’ve got an app for that

Apple has been awarded a patent in the US for a device to filter out ‘inappropriate’ language from text messages (otherwise known as ‘sexting’, apparently). Essentially, it is a way for parents to monitor and manage the content of their children’s texting. After all – as the patent tells us – ‘children may send or receive messages (intentionally or not) with parentally objectionable language.’

Messages containing words deemed unsuitable will be deleted or won’t send until the offending words are replaced.

But is this really likely to work? Is there an algorithm out there that can keep up with language’s adaptability?

One of the joys of English is how well it lends itself to puns and innuendo. Slang has an ever-changing vocabulary. And texting itself has spawned a virtual language of its own – one that parents already probably struggle to keep up with.

Hopeful parents may find that they’re not so much laying down the law as laying down a challenge. ‘Those interested in “sexting” will probably find some clever workaround,’ says technology website TechCrunch. Without being indelicate, we can probably all think of some words with provocative double meanings that wouldn’t ‘immediately set off the censorship sensors.’

Now Apple have (intentionally or not) thrown down a gauntlet, is NE1 w8ing 2 C jst hw cre8iv da msgs R gonna B?

The definitive guide to transforming the writing of individuals and teams

GET YOUR FREE PDF COPY NOW

Comments